Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Arrowood

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “the proposition that an ALJ must always base his RFC on a medical opinion from a physician is misguided”
• “the proposition that an ALJ must always base his RFC on a medical opinion from a physician is misguided”
• “In reality, however, these courts have read Doak too broadly, in effect forcing it into conflict with Chandler when no conflict actually exists.”
• “[R]eliance on Doak and the other cases cited in his brief for the proposition that an ALJ must always base his RFC on a medical opinion from a physician is misguided.”
• “[plaintiffs] reliance on Doak and the other cases cited in his brief for the proposition that an ALJ must always base his RFC on a medical opinion from a physician is misguided”
• “Doak ‘does not, as Plaintiff suggests, hold that an ALJ’s RFC findings must be based on a particular medical opinion.’” (quoting Doty v. Colvin, No. 13-80-J, 2014 WL 29036, at n.1 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 2, 2014))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).