Chesapeake & Ohio R. R. v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that while parties’ contract “explicitly disclaimed a fiduciary relationship, it did not take the additional step of disclaiming other forms of relationships that may induce reliance,” and that confidential relationship could still exist as a result
• \[N]o fiduciary duty is owed where explicit contractual disclaimers of fiduciary duty apply.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).