Chesapeake Hospital Authority v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the Department’s “bootstrapping” in an attempt to garner an “elevated level of deference” for its interpretation
• finding an assignment of error was inadequate where “[n]o one reading the . . . assignment of error could possibly know” the nature of the argument actually raised
• finding an assignment of error was inadequate where “[n]o one reading the . . . assignment of error could possibly know” the nature of the argument actually raised
• finding an assignment of error was inadequate where “[n]o one reading the . . . assignment of error could possibly know” the nature of the argument actually raised
• affirming Court of Appeals’ decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).