Skip to main content
· 7/9/1993

Ches v. Archer

Citations

  • 827 F. Supp. 159
  • 17 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1399
  • 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9455
  • 1993 WL 264467

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting defendants’ argument that “they cannot be found to have breached their fiduciary duties in the absence of an allegation and a showing that their determinations had been arbitrary and capricious”
  • rejecting defendants’ argument that “they cannot be found to have breached their fiduciary duties in the absence of an allegation and a showing that their determinations had been arbitrary and capricious”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elfvin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.