Skip to main content
· 7/28/1988

Cheryll GRAY, F/K/A Cheryll Lengyel, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COUNTY OF DANE, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 854 F.2d 179
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 11113
  • 47 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 38,194
  • 47 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 886
  • 1988 WL 82765

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the dismissal final where \there is no indication that the district court intended to retain jurisdiction. The clear purpose . . . was to end the proceeding in the district court and to permit immediate appeal\
  • finding the dismissal final where \there is no indication that the district court intended to retain jurisdiction. The clear purpose . . . was to end the proceeding in the district court and to permit immediate appeal\
  • \The offending officials clearly were not conforming to informal practices ' \so permanent and well settled as to constitute a 'custom or usage' with the force of law.\ ' \
  • “We uphold the district court’s first ground for dismissing the complaint, making it unnecessary for us to consider whether Gray properly pleaded deprivations of the equal protection clause or the first amendment.”
  • “The offending officials clearly were not conforming to informal practices ‘ “so permanent and well settled as to constitute a ‘custom or usage’ with the force of law.” ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Cudahy, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.