· 9/13/2000
Cheryl S. Conner v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Incorporated
Citations
- 227 F.3d 179
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22995
- 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,205
- 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 111
- 2000 WL 1287904
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the district court erred in its determination that irrelevant and prejudicial evidence affected the jury’s verdict
- holding that the district court erred by overturning the jury’s verdict based on its determination that irrelevant and prejudicial evidence affected the verdict
- holding that the district court erred by overturning the jury’s verdict based on its determination that irrelevant and prejudicial evidence affected the verdict
- holding that the district court’s failure to apply the appropriate legal standard amounted to an abuse of discretion
- holding that the district court’s failure to apply the appropriate legal standard amounted to an abuse of discretion
- concluding that district court may weigh the evidence and consider the credibility of the witnesses on a motion for a new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Motz, King, Copenhaver, Southern, Virginia
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.