Skip to main content
· 9/13/2000

Cheryl S. Conner v. Schrader-Bridgeport International, Incorporated

Citations

  • 227 F.3d 179
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 22995
  • 78 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,205
  • 84 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 111
  • 2000 WL 1287904

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the district court erred in its determination that irrelevant and prejudicial evidence affected the jury’s verdict
  • holding that the district court erred by overturning the jury’s verdict based on its determination that irrelevant and prejudicial evidence affected the verdict
  • holding that the district court erred by overturning the jury’s verdict based on its determination that irrelevant and prejudicial evidence affected the verdict
  • holding that the district court’s failure to apply the appropriate legal standard amounted to an abuse of discretion
  • holding that the district court’s failure to apply the appropriate legal standard amounted to an abuse of discretion
  • concluding that district court may weigh the evidence and consider the credibility of the witnesses on a motion for a new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Motz, King, Copenhaver, Southern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.