Cheryl P. Francis v. Booz, Allen & Hamilton, Incorporated, Reserve Officers Association, Amicus Supporting

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “§ 4312 applies to protect a covered individual only as to the act of rehiring”
• holding that where complained-of conduct predates protected activity and it continues, the inference of retaliatory conduct “does not arise”
• concluding that the employer satisfied Sections 4312 and 4313 when it rehired the returning service member in the same position with the same title, salary, and work
• noting that temporal proximity between protected activity and adverse action is not dispositive of a retaliation claim when the adverse action is otherwise justified
• noting that § 4312 protects military members up to the instant of reemployment while other sections of USERRA, such as § 4311 and § 4316, protect the member after reemployment occurs
• noting that § 4312 protects military members up to the instant of -11- reemployment while other sections of USERRA, such as § 4311 and § 4316, protect the member after reemployment occurs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).