Cheryl M. Hooven-Lewis v. Louis Caldera, Secretary of the Army

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was a protected disclosure for employee to approach second-line supervisor about first-line supervisor's alleged falsification of research results
• holding that, because plaintiff presented no evidence that the decisionmaker knew of the protected activity before the decisionmaker made the decision, the protected activity could not have been the cause of the adverse employment action
• explaining that both formal and informal complaints alleging discrimination can form the basis of a retaliation claim
• noting that “disputes over facts that affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law . . . preclude[s] the entry of summary judgment.”
• explaining that both formal and informal complaints alleging discrimination can form the basis of a retaliation claim
• recognizing that the Rehabilitation Act incorporates the ADA’s anti-retaliation provision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).