· 10/18/2005
Chervin v. Finkel
Citations
- 22 A.D.3d 349
- 801 N.Y.S.2d 894
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- remanding for determination of whether “suitable access” was denied abutting property owner, giving rise to action in eminent domain, where street closure for pedestrian mall allowed vehicular access to emergency vehicles only
- “[w]hat may be a suitable means of access is, of course, a question of fact to be left to the trial court”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.