Skip to main content
· 10/18/2005

Chervin v. Finkel

Citations

  • 22 A.D.3d 349
  • 801 N.Y.S.2d 894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanding for determination of whether “suitable access” was denied abutting property owner, giving rise to action in eminent domain, where street closure for pedestrian mall allowed vehicular access to emergency vehicles only
  • “[w]hat may be a suitable means of access is, of course, a question of fact to be left to the trial court”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.