Chertkov v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that Rule 4-345 expanded the traditional inherent power of a trial court to modify its own judgment in criminal cases
• recognizing the common law limit on the court’s “inherent power to modify their judgments” in criminal cases “is now codified in [the predecessor to Rule 4-345(e
• recognizing the common law limit on the court’s “inherent power to modify their judgments” in criminal cases “is now codified in [the predecessor to Rule 4-345(e
• whether a binding plea agreement precludes a trial court from modifying a sentence imposed pursuant to that agreement
• “It has long been well established that, in Maryland, trial courts have inherent power to modify their judgments both in civil and criminal cases''

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).