Skip to main content
· 12/7/1971

Chertkof v. Spector Baltimore Terminal, Inc.

Citations

  • 284 A.2d 215
  • 263 Md. 550
  • 1971 Md. LEXIS 718

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • collateral agreement is admissible despite parol evidence rule or an integration clause if that agreement is separate and distinct from original contract, is consistent with provisions of that contract, and could not reasonably be expected to be embodied in the main contract
  • collateral agreement is admissible despite parol evidence rule or an integration clause if that agreement is separate and distinct from original contract, is consistent with provisions of that contract, and could not reasonably be expected to be embodied in the main contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hammond, Barnes, McWilliams, Finan, Singley, Smith, Digges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.