Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/5/1973
Cherry v. State
Citations
- 306 A.2d 634
- 18 Md. App. 252
- 77 A.L.R. 3d 507
- 1973 Md. App. LEXIS 270
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- even the most fervent champions of free speech recognized that the First Amendment did not extend to verbal acts soliciting criminal conduct
- even the most fervent champions of free speech recognized that the First Amendment did not extend to verbal acts soliciting criminal conduct
- even the most fervent champions of free speech recognized that the First Amendment did not extend to verbal acts soliciting criminal conduct
- “It is immaterial whether the solicitation is of any effect and whether the crime solicited is in fact committed. . . . The gist of [the] offense is incitement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Orth, Moylan, Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McMillian v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-01-24· cited 129×
- Lewis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-08-27· cited 116×
- Monoker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1990-12-05· cited 103×
- Pedersen v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia· 1979-04-20· cited 69×
- Denicolis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-12-10· cited 67×
- State v. KuenySupreme Court of Iowa· 1974-02-20· cited 62×
- Summers v. AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court· 1979-01-26· cited 48×
- Huffman v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1981-12-04· cited 27×
- BELTRANBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1992-07-01· cited 27×
- Gardner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-01-12· cited 21×
- Timothy Ducharme v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 2019-08-06· cited 21×
- Ford v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-04-24· cited 20×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2006-04-26· cited 20×
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-06· cited 15×
- In re Appeal No. 180Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-11-04· cited 12×
- State v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa· 1982-01-20· cited 11×
- Frye v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-03-14· cited 10×
- Schochet v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-05-19· cited 9×
- State v. TusekCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-06-29· cited 5×
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1992-05-05· cited 5×
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court· 1964-03-09· cited 8,531×
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court· 1965-06-07· cited 4,329×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Dennis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1951-06-04· cited 1,230×
- American Communications Assn. v. DoudsSupreme Court· 1950-05-08· cited 933×
- Pruett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-11-25· cited 65×
- Blake v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1956-07-11· cited 45×
- State v. AverySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1828-07-15· cited 44×
- Hughes v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1972-02-16· cited 36×
- Riley v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1973-02-20· cited 34×
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1914-07-27· cited 26×
- Lamb v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1887-06-23· cited 21×
- Cox v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1876-06-15· cited 19×
- Masses Pub. Co. v. PattenS.D. New York· 1917-07-24· cited 19×
- Masses Pub. Co. v. PattenSecond Circuit· 1917-11-02· cited 18×
- Reed v. MaleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 1903-06-05· cited 16×
- Savoy v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1964-07-16· cited 8×
- State v. BondsNevada Supreme Court· 1866-07-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.