Cherry v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “courts look only to the statutory elements of each offense and not to the actual evidence to be presented at trial or [to] the facts alleged in a particular information.”
• vacating the lesser offenses of grand theft and remanding for resentencing on the RICO, organized fraud, and three remaining grand theft convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pizzo v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2006-12-21· cited 112×
• Pizzo v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-22· cited 11×
• Dudley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-04· cited 10×
• Kipping v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-11-21· cited 8×
• Weitz v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-09-05· cited 8×
• Winokur v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-08-05· cited 5×
• Wanner v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-01-24· cited 3×
• Saddler v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-02-23· cited 2×
• Anderson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-06-16· cited 2×
• Williamson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-01· cited 2×
• State v. Gonzalez
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-18
• Lewis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-11-26

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Blockburger v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
• Carawan v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1987-09-03· cited 474×
• State v. Barton
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1988-03-31· cited 77×
• State v. Carpenter
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1982-07-29· cited 46×
• Donovan v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-11-21· cited 30×