Cherry v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the orthopedic surgeon could testify as to his diagnosis of polyethylene wear, but he could not “offer his opinion regarding the source of the polyethylene wear”
• denying motion to amend complaint because the plaintiffs “knew of [the proposed new claim] prior to filing the complaint, and well before the deadline for amending the pleadings”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).