Skip to main content
· 10/27/1993

Cherry K. Houck v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Citations

  • 10 F.3d 204
  • 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 27863
  • 63 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 42,646
  • 63 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 188
  • 1993 WL 433173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Plaintiff “may not compare herself to a hypothetical male with a composite average of a group’s skill, effort, and responsibility, but must identify a particular male for the inquiry”
  • Plaintiff “may not compare herself to a hypothetical male with a composite average of a group’s skill, effort, and responsibility, but must identify a particular male for the inquiry”
  • Plaintiff “may not compare herself to a hypothetical male with a composite average of a group’s skill, effort, and responsibility, but must identify a particular male for the inquiry”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Widener, Wilkinson, Hilton, Eastern, Virginia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.