Cherry Haywood v. Lucent Technologies, Incorporated

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that inadmissible hearsay is not permitted as evidence in support of summary judgment motion
• stating that a case need not be presented to a jury when “the defendant presents unrebutted evidence that it would have taken the adverse employment action against the plaintiff anyway”
• “mere unhappiness and inconvenience are not actionable under Title VII”
• “mere unhappiness and inconvenience are not actionable under Title VII”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).