Cherrington v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that fraud and misrepresentation claims were unfounded “[w]here the means of knowledge [we]re at hand and equally available to both parties” (internal quotations omitted)
• fraud and misrepresentation claims unfounded \[where the means of knowledge are at hand and equally available to both parties\
• fraud and misrepresentation claims unfounded \[w]here the means of knowledge are at hand and equally available to both parties\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).