Skip to main content
· 6/1/1972

Cherokee Nation v. Oklahoma

Citations

  • 461 F.2d 674

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting a reissue application as seeking a correction that would have offended statutory requirements
  • where applicant knowingly acquiesced in restriction, no error in resulting patent; later failure “to timely file a divisional application covering the originally non-elected subject matter” immaterial to issued patent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breitenstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.