Cherokee Ins. Co., Inc. v. Sanches

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \Tennessee was the place of contract because the policy was issued and delivered to [the policyholder] in that state\
• holding that \Tennessee was the place of contract because the policy was issued and delivered to [the policyholder] in that state\
• holding that the circuit court should have applied Tennessee law to plaintiff's claim seeking uninsured-motorist benefits under automobile-insurance policy without ever questioning if subject-matter jurisdiction was proper
• holding that the circuit court should have applied Tennessee law to plaintiff's claim seeking uninsured-motorist benefits under automobile-insurance policy without ever questioning if subject-matter jurisdiction was proper
• declining to apply Alabama UM statute to fleet policy “issued and delivered in Tennessee” even though “undisputed evidence” indicated that vehicle was operated, maintained, and “principally garaged” in Alabama
• \[W]e do not discern any legislative intent that the public policies encompassed in our [UIM] statute were intended to take precedence over those of sister states.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).