Cherington v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the trial court erred in finding a violation of probation where Cherington admitted to possessing and using cocaine on some undetermined date rather than on the date specified in the affidavit of violation
• holding that the trial court erred in finding a violation of probation where Cherington admitted to possessing and using cocaine on some undetermined date rather than on the date specified in the affidavit of violation
• holding that it was error to find a probation violation where the defendant had admitted to possessing and using cocaine on some undetermined date rather than on the date specified in the affidavit of violation
• holding that the trial court erred in finding a violation of probation where Cherington admitted to possessing and using cocaine on some undetermined date rather than on the date *Effective July 1, 2017, the legislature amended section 948.06(1)(f
• \[A] trial court is not permitted to revoke probation on conduct not charged in the affidavit of violation.\ (alteration in original) (quoting Parminter v. State, 762 So. 2d 966, -3- 967 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).