Chepstow Limited v. Marshall B. Hunt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing a cause of action for civil conspiracy based on the UFTA under Georgia law against non-transferee defendants
• finding that Georgia’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act did not provide for aiding and abetting liability
• finding that Georgia’s Uniform Fraudulent Transfers Act did not provide for aiding and abetting liability
• requiring “a strong indication that the state supreme court would decide the matter differently”
• specifically applying de novo standard of review to trial court’s grant of rule 12(b)(6) motion
• under Georgia law, if a right is substantive and it is vested, it cannot be extinguished

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).