Chenkin v. Times Square Stores Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the criminal acts committed by the defendant’s employees were outside of the scope of their employment and in no way advanced the interests of the defendant, so that the defendant could not be held liable under a theory of respondeat superior” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).