· 5/7/1953
Cheney v. Sternberg
Citations
- 203 F.2d 715
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that an individual's interest in driving a vehicle represents a due process concern
- stating that a restriction on vanity plates “concern[ed] private individuals’ speech on government-owned property”
- reasoning that Vermont’s very similar vanity-plate program is a nonpublic forum
- permitting prohibition of scatological references on license plates because restrictions applied equally to all perspectives on issue
- finding Vermont’s restrictions on offensive license plate terms reasonable in light of the state’s interests in identifying vehicles and not associating the state with such speech
- finding a legitimate government interest in not being associated with offensive license plate language
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.