Skip to main content
· 5/7/1953

Cheney v. Sternberg

Citations

  • 203 F.2d 715

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an individual's interest in driving a vehicle represents a due process concern
  • stating that a restriction on vanity plates “concern[ed] private individuals’ speech on government-owned property”
  • reasoning that Vermont’s very similar vanity-plate program is a nonpublic forum
  • permitting prohibition of scatological references on license plates because restrictions applied equally to all perspectives on issue
  • finding Vermont’s restrictions on offensive license plate terms reasonable in light of the state’s interests in identifying vehicles and not associating the state with such speech
  • finding a legitimate government interest in not being associated with offensive license plate language

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.