Skip to main content
· 10/20/2008

Cheney v. IPD ANALYTICS, LLC

Citations

  • 583 F. Supp. 2d 108
  • 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83589
  • 2008 WL 4616888

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that following Sinochem, the court could address a motion to transfer venue under § 1404(a) before addressing issues of personal jurisdiction
  • holding that failure to provide notice of the plaintiff’s right to receive continued health care coverage under COBRA arose out of an employment agreement because that agreement offered a health care plan as part of employment
  • holding that failure to provide notice of the plaintiff’s right to receive continued health care coverage under COBRA arose out of an employment agreement because that agreement offered a health care plan as part of employment
  • finding that the plaintiff's tort claims \arise out of\ the employment agreement because they turn on the parties' contractual relationship
  • noting that The Bremen does not require “every court to decide the merits of a case before deciding whether transfer of venue is warranted”
  • noting that the claims “ultimately depend[] on the existence of a contractual relationship between the parties” and “resolution of the claims relates to interpretation of the contract”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John D. Bates

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.