Cheney v. Automatic Sprinkler Corp. of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• plaintiff given opportunity to amend complaint where court \for the first time ... [indicated] the relevant considerations\ for his claim
• \We . . . see no reason to treat differently a forfeiture for competition clause\
• conclusory allegations not supported by reference to facts did not warrant the legal consequences asserted
• “[T]he majority view in this country seems to be that a forfeiture for competition clause in an employment agreement is enforceable without regard to . . . reasonableness[.]”
• “In the absence of allegations of fact indicating . . . that the defendant acted in bad faith . . . , the complaint and the more definite statement fail to allege a claim on which relief can be granted”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).