Cheney v. Anchor Glass Container Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a breakdown in communication amongst counsel was sufficient for remand
• holding that the nonmovant was not prejudiced by the movant’s six-day delay
• holding that the movant demonstrated excusable neglect where the delay was based on a negligent miseommunication between the lead counsel and an associate, the delay was slight, there was no prejudice to the opposing party, and no negative impact on the judicial proceedings
• finding that a miscommunication between lawyers resulting in a six-day late filing, where there was no indication of bad faith or prejudice, constituted \excusable neglect\
• finding that miscommunication between plaintiff’s attorneys, leading to late filing, was an “omission[ ] caused by carelessness” and thus constituted excusable neglect
• holding the nonmovant was not prejudiced by the movant’s six-day delay where the parties expected to continue litigating

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).