· 5/18/1950
Chenault v. Decatur Transit
Citations
- 35 Ala. App. 664
- 47 So. 2d 920
- 1950 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 211
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that where two or more clauses of a contract conflict, the clause that is specifically directed to a particular matter controls over a clause that is general in its terms
- finding the reprocurement process to be unreasonable because the contractor failed to conduct a competition, negotiate a price, or prepare a price analysis
- claimant has burden of proving not only that delay was excusable but also that delay delayed overall completion of project
- claimant’s burden to prove not only that delay excusable but also that delay caused delay in overall completion of project
- claimant has burden of proving not only that delay was excusable but also that delay delayed overall completion of project
- claimant’s burden to prove not only that delay excusable but also that delay caused delay in overall completion of project
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.