Skip to main content
· 5/18/1950

Chenault v. Decatur Transit

Citations

  • 35 Ala. App. 664
  • 47 So. 2d 920
  • 1950 Ala. Civ. App. LEXIS 211

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where two or more clauses of a contract conflict, the clause that is specifically directed to a particular matter controls over a clause that is general in its terms
  • finding the reprocurement process to be unreasonable because the contractor failed to conduct a competition, negotiate a price, or prepare a price analysis
  • claimant has burden of proving not only that delay was excusable but also that delay delayed overall completion of project
  • claimant’s burden to prove not only that delay excusable but also that delay caused delay in overall completion of project
  • claimant has burden of proving not only that delay was excusable but also that delay delayed overall completion of project
  • claimant’s burden to prove not only that delay excusable but also that delay caused delay in overall completion of project

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.