Chenault v. Collins

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Second, Eighth, and Ninth Circuits require “deceptive conduct in addition to misrepresentations” that go beyond mere assistance with making the misrepresentation
• finding transactions with investors were “inherently deceptive” because they were not “legitimate” business transactions
• granting summary judgment against accountant for Ponzi scheme where defendant “solicited further payments from existing note-holders ... accepted investment deposits in furtherance of the BPF Ponzi scheme ... [and] generated false reports”
• § 17(a)(1) elements can satisfy § 17(a)(3) and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).