Chenault v. Banks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the trial court “acts as a mere scrivener in mechanically tallying up the amount of arrearage”
• “Under the abuse of discretion standard, sufficiency of the evidence is not an independent ground of error . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).