Chen v. Univ. of Dayton
Citations
- 228 N.E.3d 19
- 2023 Ohio 4002
Syllabus
Appellant, a former tenure-track professor, appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the university on his breach of contract claim related to the denial of his application for promotion and tenure. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying appellant's Civ.R. 56(F) motion. The trial court did not err in concluding that appellant was required to exhaust the university's internal administrative remedies prior to filing his breach of contract claim. The trial court did not err in granting judgment, as a matter of law, to the university on appellant's breach of contract claim. Judgment affirmed.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that it would “squarely violate[]” the Confrontation Clause even to “suggest” that a redacted confession implicated a codefendant
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.