Chen v. Michigan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that respondeat superior is the appropriate claim if the employee acted within the scope of her employment
• providing that respondeat superior is the appropriate claim if the employee acted within the scope of her employment
• noting that if an employee was not liable, “there is no basis for imposing [respondeat superior] liability on the employer”
• “To maintain a claim against a[n] . . . employer for the negligent hiring, training, and retention of a tortfeasor under New York law, a plaintiff must show that the employee acted outside the scope of her employment.” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).