Skip to main content
· 5/19/1932

Chemische Fabrik Von Heyden Aktiengesellschaft v. Tait

Citations

  • 58 F.2d 814
  • 11 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 308
  • 1932 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1230
  • 1932 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9283
  • 11 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 308

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Defendant also chose not to recall the victim for cross-examination although he could have after the prosecutor played the DVD.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chesnut

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.