Skip to main content
· 3/16/1993

Chemical Leaman Tank Lines, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

Citations

  • 817 F. Supp. 1136
  • 1993 WL 72303

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the term “accident” does not necessarily have a temporal component
  • admitting evidence of plaintiff insured's problems at other tank cleaning sites on issue of company's knowledge
  • admitting evidence of plaintiff insured's problems at other tank cleaning sites on issue of company's knowledge
  • finding insured cannot recover defense costs predating notice to in- surer
  • definition of “occurrence” in CGL policy constitutes grant of basic coverage under policy, and insured bears the burden of proving all elements of the definition
  • The knowledge issue is “necessarily a disputed issue ... for resolution at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brotman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.