· 6/21/1977
Chemical Fireproofing Corp. v. Bronska
Citations
- 553 S.W.2d 710
- 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2193
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating further that fines for civil contempt should be related to the litigant’s actual damages, as the purpose is remedial
- stating further that fines for civil contempt should be related to the litigant’s actual damages, as the purpose is remedial
- deeming the purpose of criminal contempt is to preserve the power and vindicate the authority and the dignity of the court, and to punish for disobedience of its orders
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMillian, Stewart, Reinhard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.