Skip to main content
· 6/21/1977

Chemical Fireproofing Corp. v. Bronska

Citations

  • 553 S.W.2d 710
  • 1977 Mo. App. LEXIS 2193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating further that fines for civil contempt should be related to the litigant’s actual damages, as the purpose is remedial
  • stating further that fines for civil contempt should be related to the litigant’s actual damages, as the purpose is remedial
  • deeming the purpose of criminal contempt is to preserve the power and vindicate the authority and the dignity of the court, and to punish for disobedience of its orders

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McMillian, Stewart, Reinhard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.