Chemetall Gmbh v. Zr Energy, Inc., Joseph T. Fraval, and Arnold Berkovitz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under Illinois law, “an assignor may transfer some or all of its rights”
• explaining that even after a trial we may review an earlier denial of summary judgment if the motion for summary judgment raised legal, and not factual, issues
• approving consideration of contract attached to motion to dismiss where plaintiff referenced the contract in the complaint
• considering contracts attached to motion to dismiss where they were referenced in the complaint and central to the breach of contact claim and the authenticity of the contracts was not in question
• reviewing a district court’s denial of a motion for summary judgment, notwithstanding the party’s failure to raise it in a motion for judgment as a matter of law at trial, where the motion raised legal issues other than the sufficiency of the evidence
• reviewing 14 Nos. 06-2283, 06-2549 and 06-2575 a district court’s denial of a motion for summary judg- ment, notwithstanding the party’s failure to raise it in a motion for judgment as a matter of law at trial, where the motion raised legal issues other than the sufficiency of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).