Chem Lab Products, Inc., a Corporation v. Frank N. Stepanek, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[D]irecting that the letter be mailed to California 26 could not support personal jurisdiction over defendant because he did not commit any 27 personal acts with consequences in California.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “mere allegations 19 of a complaint, when contradicted by affidavits, are not enough to confer personal 20 jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant”
• “The mere allegations of a complaint, when contradicted by affidavits, are not enough to confer personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant.”
• “The mere allegations of a complaint, when contradicted by affidavits, are not enough to confer personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant.”
• “The mere allegations of a complaint, when contradicted by affidavits, are not enough to confer personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant.”
• “The mere allegations of a complaint, when contradicted by affidavits, are not enough to confer personal jurisdiction over a non-resident defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).