Chelsea Square Textiles, Inc., Kenneth Lazar, Lester Gribetz v. Bombay Dyeing and Manufacturing Company, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an “obliterated” and “garbled” arbitration clause, printed “in type which is so faint as to border on the ephemeral,” on the reverse side of “very thin, tissue-style paper,”- nevertheless was sufficient to bind the parties to arbitration
• upholding an arbitration clause “pursuant to the rules set forth by Texprocil in Bombay, India”
• describing FAA as evincing “a strong federal policy favoring arbitration” (quotation marks omitted)
• “[E]vidence of trade usage and course of dealings between parties supported ... finding of an agreement to arbitrate.”
• “Through the FAA, Congress has declared a strong federal policy favoring arbitration as an alternative means of dispute resolution.” (quotation marks omitted)
• “Through the FAA, Congress has declared a strong federal policy favoring arbitration as an alternative means of dispute resolution.” (quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).