Skip to main content
· 1/3/2007

Chelsea Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. 1815 a St., Condominium Group, LLC

Citations

  • 468 F. Supp. 2d 136
  • 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17
  • 2007 WL 13792

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no supplemental jurisdiction over state law claims alleging misrepresentations during marketing of condominiums where federal law claims alleged conflict of interest during the same sale
  • “[T]his part of the test is not satisfied by a mechanistic calculation of the number of claims[.]”
  • “Pro se prisoner plaintiffs may not 18 bring class actions. They are not qualified to act as class representatives as they are unable to fairly 19 represent and adequately protect the interests of the class.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ricardo M. Urbina

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.