Chefline Corp. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• deferring review of portion of agency determination until receipt of remand results on related issue
• “[I]t is within the [ITC]’s discretion to make reasonable interpretations of the evidence and to determine the overall significance of any particular factor or piece of evidence.”
• “Chefline’s claim of departure from prior practice would perhaps have merit if it were the case that the Commission found a ‘continuum’ of domestic products, then ‘artificially divided’ it by ignoring ‘minor differences’ or ‘competitive realities.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).