Cheff v. Edwards

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “foreclosure by advertisement is not a judicial action”
• “[F]oreclosure by advertisement is not a judicial action . . . , but rather is based on contract between the mortgagor and the mortgagee.”
• upholding the constitutionality of Michigan's foreclosure-by-advertisement statute and collecting cases
• “[F]oreclosure by advertisement is . . . based on contract between the mortgagor and the mortgagee. . . . [T]he statute[ ] may be viewed as harsh or offensive but . . . [it] applies equally to all who choose to involve themselves in this type of business.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).