Cheetham v. Brickman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• reversing a section 57.105 fee award, in part, because there was “no evidence that Cheetham took any action ‘primarily for the purpose of unreasonable delay’ within the meaning of section 57.105(3) of the Florida Statutes”
• \The law is clear that only a prevailing party who recovers a judgment is entitled to recover costs under section 57.041.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).