Cheeks v. Miller

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “A controversy is justiciable when it is definite and concrete, rather 15 than being hypothetical, abstract, academic, or moot.”
• this Court not authorized to render an advisory opinion on hypothetical and legal questions that have not yet arisen
• “A controversy is justiciable when it is definite and concrete, rather than being hypothetical, abstract, academic, or moot.”
• “A controversy is justiciable when it is definite and concrete, rather than being hypothetical, abstract, 8 academic, or moot.”
• “A controversy is justiciable when it is definite and concrete, rather than being hypothetical, abstract, academic, or moot.”
• “A controversy is justiciable when it is definite and concrete, rather than being hypothetical, abstract, academic, or moot.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).