Cheek v. City of Edwardsville, Kan.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that police officers’ speech was not protected because it was undisputed that officers were responsible for investigating criminal conduct
• contemplating the lack of binding power that would result from an officer acting outside of their office’s specific statutory authority

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).