Checkrite Petroleum, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the legislative history of the PMPA did not give rise to a “clearly expressed legislative intent” to override the plain terms of the PMPA
• legislative history of the act expresses no intent to expand protection of PMPA beyond plain meaning of its terms
• corporation that contracted to sign up gas stations to purchase petroleum products from Amoco was not an “affiliate” within meaning of federal Petroleum Marketing Practices Act because it did not control, was not controlled by, and was not under common control with Amoco
• governm ent sold food stam ps at illegal discount
• applying standard of review to interpretation of PMPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).