Checkout Holdings, LLC v. Amplified Holdings, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the single controversy doctrine requires marital tort claims to be alleged in conjunction with the divorce action
• holding that marital tort, an assault, should have been asserted in the prior divorce action
• recognizing that the single controversy doctrine requires marital tort claims to be alleged in conjunction with the divorce action
• holding that wife’s tort claims should have been presented in conjunction with the divorce action “to lay at rest all their legal differences in one proceeding and avoid the prolongation and fractionalization of litigation”
• holding that statute of limitations was not tolled under the insanity provision where plaintiff had “apparently suffered substantial injuries but she was not incapacitated or prevented by her physical or mental trauma from pursuing her legal rights”
• holding that statute of limitations was not tolled under the insanity provision where plaintiff had \apparently suffered substantial injuries but she was not incapacitated or prevented by her physical or mental trauma from pursuing her legal rights\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).