Cheatham v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “the court is not compelled under the rules to grant defendant a continuance pri- or to sentencing upon his motion therefor”
• holding no abuse of discretion where the defendant “was given an opportunity to submit evidence in mitigation of sentence, and [finding that] the trial court fully complied with the requirements of Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.720”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-05-31· cited 18×
• Hargis v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-06-21· cited 10×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-02-10· cited 6×
• Mason v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-01-16· cited 4×
• Green v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-07-12· cited 3×
• Jones v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-05-08· cited 3×
• Small v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-05-29· cited 2×
• Gitman v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-02-26
• Matamoros v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-11-23
• Adonis Losada v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-01-31
• Vladimir Jean Moise v. The State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-02-28

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hedges v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1965-03-17· cited 109×
• Mills v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-07-10· cited 13×
• Bristow v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1976-10-19· cited 12×
• Douglas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-26· cited 7×
• Mask v. State
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1973-12-19· cited 3×