District Court of Appeal of Florida· 11/13/1978
Cheatham v. State
Citations
- 364 So. 2d 83
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- failure to comply with requirements that supervising attorney be present and defendant be informed of student status
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Pearson, Hendry and Barkdull
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Seattle v. RatliffWashington Supreme Court· 1983-08-11· cited 37×
- Durcan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1980-04-01· cited 9×
- In Interest of CBDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-07-12· cited 9×
- Duval v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-10-08· cited 8×
- State v. EdisonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-06-10· cited 2×
- Thornhill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-12-12· cited 1×
- Duval v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-11· cited 1×
- Hudson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1979-10-02
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.