Skip to main content
· 3/17/1997

Chea v. Men's Wearhouse, Inc.

Citations

  • 932 P.2d 1261
  • 85 Wash. App. 405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “a plaintiff must show either an actual violation, or that the purpose of the law was violated”
  • \We agree with the Johnson court's holding that a separate claim for emotional distress is not compensable when the only factual basis for the emotional distress was the discrimination claim\ on which the plaintiff had also prevailed.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.