C.H.E., Ltd. v. Kent

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• subdivision’s restrictive covenants which had been made applicable to “lots” clearly did not apply to tract within subdivision plat not designated as a “lot”
• reversing the trial court’s imposition of restrictions based on covenants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).