CHE Consulting, Inc. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• regarding a requirement that a single contractor provide both hardware maintenance and software maintenance for a particular system
• declining to address whether supplementation was proper, because “[w]ithout supplementation, the record in this case provides a rational basis for [the Government’s] decision”
• “Procurement officials have substantial discretion to determine which proposal represents the best value for the government.” (quotation omitted)
• “NAVO established a rational basis to combine hardware and software services into one contract before the trial court requested supplementation. The additions to the administrative record were thus not necessary.”
• “NAVO established a rational basis to combine hardware and software services into one contract before the trial court requested supplementation. The additions to the administrative record were thus not necessary.”
• “Indeed [the government agency] has a responsibility to assess risks and avoid them before they become a historical fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).